EDITORIAL STANDARD

Editorial and Testing Standard

Responsible team: StarDestiny AI EditorialVersion 1.0

This page explains how our knowledge base selects topics, verifies sources, tests examples, and handles corrections. We separate verifiable timekeeping and calendar facts, observed software behavior, and traditional astrological interpretation.

Authorship and accountability

The StarDestiny AI editorial team writes and maintains these guides and is responsible for source checks, recalculating examples, link maintenance, and updates. We do not invent individual expert biographies. Report errors through the contact page.

Source hierarchy

  1. Prefer government bodies, astronomical institutions, and standards databases for astronomy, calendars, and legal time.
  2. Use current site code, the locked iztro version, and repeatable tests for software behavior.
  3. Describe school differences as traditional conventions, not astronomy or established science.
  4. Return to primary or authoritative material whenever possible.

How calculations are tested

Each example preserves the original civil time, place, longitude or zone, formula, rounding steps, and result. Solar-time examples use longitude difference × four minutes per degree plus the date-specific equation of time. Historical examples record the IANA identifier and legal UTC offset. We preserve uncertainty near boundaries.

How we use AI

AI may organize a draft or propose material for verification; it is not a factual source. An editor checks formulas, dates, links, product limits, and high-risk statements before publication. Chart readings cannot replace medical, psychological, legal, financial, or safety advice.

Corrections and updates

Material revisions receive a new modification date. A useful correction report includes the URL, disputed wording, proposed change, and a verifiable source.

Core references

← Back to Knowledge BaseSubmit a correction →